The
question that jumps out at me as I read through the episode of the Golden Calf
once again in Parshat Ki Tisa is: What was Aharon thinking/ trying to
accomplish? According to the text the nation comes to Aharon for help and it
appears that it is only through Aharon’s facilitating that the Golden Calf is
created. Such behavior does not fit with our understanding of who Aharon was:
older brother of Moshe, the first Kohen Gadol, a man committed to both God and his
fellow human being. Was he trying to stall until Moshe got back? Was Aharon
attempting to divert the nation’s attention? In his book, Unlocking the Torah Text, Rabbi Shmuel Goldin discusses the various
approaches offered by Midrash and Rabbinic sources, but concludes his piece on
the following note:
“When all is said and done, the
issue of Aharon’s involvement in chet ha’egel is one of those cases where the
questions are better than the answers.” Being that we may never arrive at a
completely satisfying answer, I’d like to share with you an idea that came to
me this year as I was learning the Parsha.
I believe that the key to my
approach is found in a word mentioned early on in the Jews’ plans: Vayikahel (32:1): the nation approached
Aharon. The word is related to the word kehilla, which means a community. It
may imply that the nation gathered in front of Aharon in a spirit of unity and
cooperation. Granted, thye gathered for the wrong reasons in this case. It is
fair to assume that Aaron had serious reservations about what was being asked of
him. However, being a man who loved peace and always tried to foster peace
between people, Aharon was enamored by the cohesiveness of the people at that
moment.
Of course the Golden Calf was wrong
and the Jewish People are punished (whether Aharon is ever punished for his
role is a matter of dispute and depends on one’s understanding of what exactly
transpired). But the lesson of the importance of community was one that remains
true, even if learned under the dubious circumstances of the Chet Ha’Egel.
Perhaps Aharon said to himself-
"I’d rather not be involved in the golden calf.” He may have said, “I don’t
have much of a choice, so let me try to mitigate the guilt of the people.” But perhaps he also said, “with such a degree
of cooperation and unity- it can't end up all bad." And one could argue
that Aharon was right- because although the Egel was a mistake, it led to the
13 Midot Harachamim and the Second Luchot, and perhaps even the notion of a
Mishkan/ Beit Hamikdash (depending on which commentary you hold like). If the
foundation is one of unity and cooperation, then even mistakes can be utilized
for some good outcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment