“Kol Hamitzvah” that I command you today you shall observe
to perform…" (8:1).
According to the normal reading of the first two words of
this verse, Moshe is referring to a number of mitzvoth that have been mentioned
and need to be taken seriously and fulfilled. However Rashi quotes the Midrash
that in this instance, Kol does not mean “all the commandments”, but “the
entire commandment.” The reason that such an interpretation is possible is
because the word Mitzvah is in the singular. And therefore the phrase “all the
mitzvah” begs for further explanation.
The
Medrash explains that from here we learn the importance of finishing a mitzvah
that you start. The Medrash goes on to teach that the credit for the mitzvah is
given to s/he that completes it, and not to the person that initiated the act. The
proof is the fact that the nation as a whole is given credit for bringing the
bones of Yosef out of Egypt and facilitating their burial in Shechem. This is
the case even though we know that it was Moshe who personally ensured that
Yosef’s casket was taken out of Egypt. In fact in Sefer Shemot the Medrash
notes that the people could not be bothered with Yosef’s bones as they were too
busy looting Egypt of its valuables.
This
Medrash seems unfair. First in its specific example- Moshe would have finished
the task had he been allowed entry into the land of Israel. And more broadly, this Medrash seems to
completely ignore the role of those individuals with great ideas. Even if their
idea does not make it to fulfillment, it has nonetheless been created and
perhaps someone else will make it a reality. Does the innovator in such a case
get no credit for that initial idea?
I think the Medrash means for us to learn two lessons.
First, while the whole nations may get the credit for burying Yosef, that does
not mean that they should not be sharing that credit with Moshe. It is incumbent
upon each of us upon succeeding to give credit to all those that helped us make
it to that point of success.
Second,
although ideas are important, if not crucial, we must not get overly enamored
by the fame of innovation. We must similarly be impressed by the hard work and
stick – to – it-tivness that goes into turning an idea into a success.