In an interview for the September issue of British Vogue
magazine, Prince Harry interviewed noted primatologist Dr. Jane Goodall (who
famously studied chimpanzees for 55 years) and the conversation turned to the
need to preserve our planet for the next generation. Harry noted that his
travels have allowed him to connect with and appreciate nature, “even before
having a child, and hoping to have children.”
“Not too many!” Dr. Goodall said with a laugh. Harry
responded: “Two, maximum!”
There is an idea that has gained increased traction in
society that 1) The best thing we can do for our planet is have less children and
2) It is wrong/ selfish/ foolish to bring children into the world as it
currently exists. This attitude is often associated with those who espouse a
commitment to the environment. Earth is over populated. Too many people are
fighting over scarce resources. More humans means more pollution and more
damage to the planet. A number of celebrities, with millions of “followers”
have subscribed to this way of thinking; either questioning whether it is
proper to bring children into this world, or declaring that they have no
intention of having children until there are major improvements in the
environment. In the European Union today, the birth rate is 1.6 children per
woman, well below the 2.1 “replacement rate” that is necessary to maintain
populations.
But as Jeff Jacoby, columnist for the Boston Globe, points
out, if they want to make the world better, the way to do so is not by
depriving it of more children. He wrote in his column this week:
It is an inescapable fact of life
that to be born is to suffer, to struggle, and to stumble. There has never been
an age in which that wasn’t true, and people in most ages have contended with
far more daunting fates than a warmer climate: war, famine, slavery, poverty,
plague. Not having children may spare theoretical offspring from inheriting a
world with terrible problems. But it also denies the world the ultimate
resource for fixing those problems — human intelligence, imagination, and grit…
Every time parents bring children into a world where things have gone badly
wrong, they improve the odds that there will someone to help set things right.
Jacoby quotes the story of the birth of Moshe. At that time
most Israelites had stopped having babies: saying why should we have more
children subjected to this Egyptian cruelty and oppression? This was Amram’s
thinking too, until his daughter Miriam convinced him otherwise. As a result
Moshe was born, leader of the Jewish People who facilitated their redemption
from Egypt.
On Tisha B’Av some of the most tragic stories are those
involving the suffering of children: The tragedy of the children on the ship at
sea (Kinah 16 “Zechor Ashar Asah”), the depressing tale of the son and daughter
of Rabbi Yishmael Kohen Gadol (Kinah 23 “v’et Navi”), the gruesome story of
Doeg Ben Yosef (see Eicha 2:20 and Talmud Yoma 38b). After such destruction and
tragedy it might be understandable why some respond by vowing not to bring any
more children into a world that is so broken and full of so much pain. And yet
our Rabbis (Talmud Yevamot 62a) teach the exact opposite:
אין בן דוד בא עד שיכלו כל נשמות שבגוף:
Moshiach will only come once all souls that have been destined to inhabit physical bodies will do so.
Every child can be
viewed as one step closer to the ultimate Redemption. In Israel today the birth
rate is 3.1 children per woman, significantly higher than all other comparable
developed countries (Mexico is second with a rate of 2.15). The birth rate in Israel is comparable to the
"baby boom" in the United States after World War II.
We live in
complicated times. Let us respond to these times by valuing the importance of
children, for the Jewish People and for all of humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment